New York Views: David Rabinowitch
February 2007
by Joe Walentini, New York Views is published twice monthly.
Creative solitude is something I think all visual artists need and enjoy to some degree. Our tribe is like those proverbial cats that are not given to herding. As a collection of individuals we don’t organize easily. There is something unique about making art that has much to do with singular control over both process and result. Other facets play into this too which include how time is impacted and the opportunity to be true to our natures. When I paint there is no role I have to play, no one to impress or appease, in short, no one I have to answer to except my muse. Unlike Batman I’m no vigilante crime fighter striving for good. But like Batman I have my secrets to keep, my private mission to accomplish and a striving for good albeit on my terms.
Contemporary work aside, what of
the current exhibition? As pointed out in past reviews Rabinowitch is
perhaps best known as a sculptor but his works on paper prove he is able to
deliver in 2 dimensions as well. (Yet it must be pointed out that even his 3D
work stays mighty close to 2D). This show is a marvelous presentation of
these dual capabilities with neither overpowering the other. It might be
easy to see the sculpture as the stronger suit with the advantages it
has. These heavy dark metal objects are shaped into massive folds.
Self-possessed of a counter- intuitive delicacy they have a sense of being
spilled onto the concrete floor which they dominate. Throughout the
gallery there are a number of naturally occurring cracks in the cement which
seemed caused by the weight of these pieces. The unintended effect is
paradoxical for suggesting that the work, looking like large folded sheets of
heavy paper, could also be so heavy as to crack the floor.
In comparison to the works on the walls, the sculpture, for all its mass, impact and novel use of the gallery space, is exceedingly passive and is therefore unable to hijack control of this show. Some of this is a matter of numbers where the wall pieces significantly outnumber the sculpture.Then there is the austere yet expressive quality of the paper work. The reductive and diminutive imagery projects beyond the limitations of size and is also more taken in as a whole as compared to the sculpture which can only be viewed at some sort of angle. They also have the advantage of texture, a wider range and use of line and more color, albeit within a tight range of earth tones, grays and blacks. Yet for all the differences between the two mediums Rabinowitch links them with a common vocabulary of forms and a similar approach to the materials. But ultimately they are tied together in the manner by which they express the artist’s esthetic.

